|
Accident Claims Process In Need Of Urgent Reform |
Article Submitted by: Christian Ward
Sunday, 03 August 2008
|
The Ministry of Justice and stakeholder groups have, for the last two years, been debating about the need to reform the process for accident claims. However the government has not yet set out its response. This has led to frustration and uncertainty for insurers and lawyers alike. The National Accident Helpline, however, sees this as potentially a positive sign. The initial proposals in the consultation seemed to signal a fundamental shift in the current system towards a more insurance-based approach for small claims and it may be that the government are reconsidering this radical change. The current system is prone to delays, most often this due to the lack of rigorous enforcement of time limits or behaviour protocols for both lawyers and insurers. Reform might focus on these areas, but change should not undermine the level playing field which has been at the heart of the accident claims system in England and Wales. To do so would restrict choice and risk the quality of justice available to claimants. Restricting claim investigation to the defendant insurer alone, as originally proposed, further undermines the existing balance between insurers and solicitors which is vital in any fair system. It increases the likelihood of the insurer under-settling or approaching the claimant with an offer to settle direct, despite that placing the insurer in an obvious conflict of interest. The same access to justice issues arise if inflexible time limits or generic claim forms are introduced -- these too will restrict the claimant's solicitor from carrying out appropriate investigation. Groups such as the National Accident Helpline are wary of any proposal to fix costs which does not set out the level at which such costs will be fixed. Any fair process must have the consumer's interests at heart. There are concerns that a fixed costs regime will be too inflexible and will not allow lawyers to provide appropriate support in complex cases. It would be tragic if the consultation arrived at proposals which would disproportionately affect clients with limited knowledge or experience of the current systems, or those who face other barriers to justice such as poor English. The government must listen and show it is committed to ensuring that there remains a fair system for injured people to have access to high quality legal advice. Article Source: http://www.ArticleBlast.com |
About The Author:
Christian is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Accident Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.
Christian is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Accident Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.
You are welcome to publish this article free of charge on your website, newsletter, or e-zine, provided:
- You don't change the article in any way
- You include the entire article, including the "about the author" box
- All hyperlinks must remain intact, including email addresses, and the link to ArticleBlast.com at the bottom
- In doing so you agree to indemnify the article's author, and ArticleBlast.com and its directors, officers, employees and agents from and against all losses, claims, damages and liabilities which arise out of its use
- It is also recommended that you provide a courtesy copy of your publication to the author of the article
